Guides / Family court
Chapter 3 · 5 min read
What the family court is actually trying to decide
In short
- 1The court decides what's best for your child, not who wins between the adults.
- 2Learn the welfare checklistWelfare checklist. The list of factors in section 1(3) of the Children Act 1989 the court considers when deciding what is best for a child. and show how your proposals meet your child's needs.
- 3There's no automatic 50/50. A practical plan built around your child is what persuades.
- 4Check whether the presumption repeal is in force and which court model your area uses.
Understanding the court's starting point removes a lot of fear. It also shows you what to focus on.
The child's welfare comes first
Under section 1 of the Children Act 1989, when the court decides any question about a child's upbringing, the child's welfare is its paramount consideration. Not the wishes of either parent, not fairness between the adults and not the history of the relationship.[2]
The Act also says that delay is likely to harm a child, and that the court should only make an order if doing so would be better for the child than making no order at all.
The welfare checklistWelfare checklist. The list of factors in section 1(3) of the Children Act 1989 the court considers when deciding what is best for a child.
When an application is opposed, the court considers the factors in the welfare checklist:[2]
- the child's wishes and feelings, considered in light of their age and understanding
- their physical, emotional and educational needs
- the likely effect on them of any change in circumstances
- their age, sex, background and any relevant characteristics
- any harm they have suffered or are at risk of suffering
- how capable each parent, and any other relevant person, is of meeting their needs
- the range of orders available to the court
No single factor automatically outweighs the others. Notice what isn't on the list: who left whom, who was hurt more, or who has the better argument.
The checklist is in section 1(3) of the Children Act 1989. It's short, and worth reading in full. CafcassCafcass. The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service, which advises the family court on children's welfare in England. Cafcass Cymru does the same in Wales. and the judge will use it, so it helps to use it too: when you write a proposal or a statement, show how it meets each part.
Supporting the other relationship
Courts generally recognise that children benefit from a safe, meaningful relationship with both parents. A parent who can show that he supports his child's relationship with the other parent, where it's safe, and who talks about arrangements without turning every conversation to the conflict, is easier for the court to trust. This doesn't mean pretending everything is fine. It means keeping the frame on your child.
The presumption of parental involvement
Since 2014, the law has said the court should start from the view that both parents being involved is good for a child, as long as it's safe.[3] It has never meant a set amount of time.
The Government plans to remove it, because of concerns it could lead to unsafe arrangements where there's domestic abuse. That change is in the Courts and Tribunals Bill, which is still going through Parliament. Until it becomes law, the presumption still applies.[3]
It can feel like a step backwards for dads. In practice, little changes. The court still decides what's best for your child, using the welfare checklist. What will matter even more is the evidence: how involved you have been, how you have behaved and how well your plan fits your child.
No automatic 50/50
There's no rule in England and Wales that children spend equal time with each parent. Many dads expect it, and it's a shock to find out it isn't the starting point. Here's why.
- The law is about the child, not fairness between parents. The court's only question is what's best for your child.[2] Equal time is fair to the adults, but that isn't what the court is measuring. Half and half is only right if it works for your child.
- Every child's needs are different. A baby or toddler may need shorter, more frequent time. A teenager may want a say, and more time with friends. A child with additional needs may struggle with lots of moving between homes. The same split can suit one child and not another.
- Practical things matter. The court looks at real life: how far apart the homes are, the school run, each parent's work hours and who has been doing the day-to-day care. Living 40 minutes away, or working shifts, can make equal time hard on a child, however much you want it.
- Safety comes first. If there are concerns about domestic abuse or harm, the court has to deal with those before deciding how time is shared.[4]
What this means for you
None of this stops you asking for equal or shared care, and many dads have it. The court can also make a "lives with" order for both parents, so your child is recognised as living in two homes, even when the time isn't exactly equal.[2]
What makes the difference is a plan that's built around your child, not the clock. Show where they would sleep, how they would get to school, who would be around after school and how you would handle handovers. A detailed, realistic proposal for slightly less than half is often more persuasive than a demand for exactly 50/50.
“I want 50/50. It's my right as their dad.”
I'd like the children to live with both of us. I work from home three days a week and live ten minutes from their school, so I can do the school run Monday to Wednesday and every other weekend.
Domestic abuse and safety
Where domestic abuse is alleged or admitted, the court must follow Practice Direction 12JPractice Direction 12J. The rules the court must follow where domestic abuse is alleged or admitted.. It requires the court to identify allegations early, consider whether a fact-finding hearingFact-finding hearing. A hearing where the court decides whether disputed allegations are proved on the balance of probabilities. is needed and make sure any arrangements are safe for the child and the parent the child lives with.[4]
This applies whichever parent raises concerns. Fathers can be victims of domestic abuse too, and Chapter 9 covers this.
Child Focused Courts
The way private law cases run is changing. The Child Focused ModelChild Focused Model. The reformed way of running private law children cases, formerly the Private Law Pathfinder, being rolled out across England and Wales., formerly the Private Law Pathfinder, was confirmed for national rollout in March 2026 and is being introduced area by area over the next few years. It's already used across Wales and in several areas of England, with more joining each year. In these courts, more work happens before the first hearing: Cafcass or a local authority speaks with the child and both parents early, and prepares a report that helps the court decide what's needed.[5]
The law is the same either way. Ask the court office which model your local court is using, so you know what to expect.